Neptune Fountain and park at Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna

SGEM Vienna GREEN · Publication standards

Call for Reviewers

SGEM Vienna GREEN, Schloß Schönbrunn
Photo: Simon Matzinger · CC BY-SA 3.0

Call for Article Reviewers

We welcome researchers with expertise in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Green Sciences, and a proven scientific publication record, to take part in the SGEM peer-review process.

The Vienna GREEN scientific topics cover sustainable resource use, water and ecosystems, clean energy, environmental protection, green technologies and interdisciplinary research for a sustainable future. Explore the conference topics and sections →

Apply as an article reviewer → · EPS reviewer directory →

SGEM Earth and Planetary Sciences peer-review community

The common SWS review process and criteria are reproduced below. View the official current version

Double-Blind Peer Review

All submissions are reviewed by a minimum of two to three independent reviewers, selected automatically by AMMS.
Reviewers are matched based on:
       - Area of expertise
       - Topical relevance
       - Reviewer availability and workflow balance
The entire process is double-blind: authors and reviewers remain anonymous to one another, ensuring fairness, impartiality, and objectivity.
Reviewers complete their evaluations directly within AMMS, where they may:
       - Submit structured evaluations and recommendations
       - Add detailed comments for authors
       - Leave confidential notes for the Scientific or Editorial Committee

Evaluation Criteria

  Abstract Review Criteria
       - Relevance to the Conference or Journal Scope
       - Contribution to the Scientific or Academic Debate
       - Clarity of the Research Problem, Aim, and Objectives
       - Appropriateness of the Research Methodology
       - Standard of English
       - Use and Relevance of Keywords
       - Appropriate Section or Topic Selection
       - Overall Abstract Quality and Impression
       - Final Recommendation: Accept / Minor Revisions / Major Revisions / Reject
       - Reviewer Comments

  Manuscript Review Criteria
       - Scientific Merit and Validity
       - Clarity of Writing, Structure, and Logical Flow
       - Quality and Appropriateness of Figures and Tables
       - Relevance and Depth of the Discussion
       - Justification of the Conclusions
       - Interdisciplinary Relevance and Broader Impact
       - Originality and Novelty of the Research
       - Final Recommendation: Accept / Accept with Revisions / Reject
       - Reviewer Comments

Your application expresses your interest; it does not automatically confirm an appointment. Selected researchers receive an invitation from the committee. Complete the official reviewer application →

Publication Dissemination & Discovery

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database